Legal Opinion

Feagin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 1983No. AS-410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal from a judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere is dismissed because appellant did not reserve his right to appeal any issue when entering his plea of nolo contendere. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, if such presentation in the lower court has not been barred by some other limitation.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and NIM-MONS, JJ.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Chapin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Poe & Associates, Inc. v. EmbertonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API