Claim of Blair v. Bendix Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Until July 1, 1974, an employee disabled by a dust disease, such as asbestosis, was entitled to workers’ compensation only in the event of total disability. Workers’ Compensation Law § 39 was amended, effective July 1, 1974, to afford a remedy to any employee disabled, whether partially or completely, as a result of exposure to noxious dust in the course of employment, provided such exposure occurred on or after July 1, 1974 (see, L 1974, ch 577, §§ 3, 6).
Claimant appellant was exposed to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Fama v. P & M SorbaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Fonda v. Cambridge Filter Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Matott v. St. Joe's LeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Valenti v. Penn Plax PlasticsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hinton v. Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997