Legal Opinion

Claim of Blair v. Bendix Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Until July 1, 1974, an employee disabled by a dust disease, such as asbestosis, was entitled to workers’ compensation only in the event of total disability. Workers’ Compensation Law § 39 was amended, effective July 1, 1974, to afford a remedy to any employee disabled, whether partially or completely, as a result of exposure to noxious dust in the course of employment, provided such exposure occurred on or after July 1, 1974 (see, L 1974, ch 577, §§ 3, 6).

Claimant appellant was exposed to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fama v. P & M SorbaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Claim of Fonda v. Cambridge Filter Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Claim of Matott v. St. Joe's LeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Claim of Valenti v. Penn Plax PlasticsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Hinton v. Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API