Legal Opinion

Baca v. Gutierrez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1967No. 8035PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee Baca filed a claim in district court for 10% increased workmen’s compensation pursuant to § 59-10-7, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. The claim alleged that defendant-appellant Antonio Gutierrez, d/b/a Pueblo Electric Company, negligently failed to supply a reasonable safety device, to-wit a safety belt, in general use for the protection of appellee, and such failure was the proximate cause of appellee’s injuries. This appeal is from a judgment granting the 10% increased workmen’s compensation.

On October 31, 1963, while in the employment of Gutierrez, Baca…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael v. BaumanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. J. A. Silversmith, Inc. v. MarchiondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Apodaca v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cooper v. Bank of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wright v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Springer Corp. v. Kirkeby-NatusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Garza v. W. A. Jourdan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Springer Corporation v. Kirkeby-NatusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Corley v. CorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API