Cardona v. State

SHARP, W., J.

concurring specially.

I agree this case should be affirmed. But, I also think it is important to state the reasons for affirming.

Cardona was convicted of false imprisonment without a weapon, improper exhibition of a deadly weapon, and exposure of his sexual organs,1 after he attacked Zvosec (the victim in this case), on the Rollins College campus. On appeal, Car-dona argues that the testimony of two state witnesses, Calandra and Raymond, were erroneously admitted as Williams Rule evidence.2 In my view, the facts established at trial and the law support the trial court’s…