Legal Opinion

Byrd v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1986No. 84-1266PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

We granted appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc to consider his contention that for a single killing he may not be convicted of, and receive concurrent sentences for, both first-degree felony murder while armed and first-degree premeditated murder while armed. The division which initially heard this appeal was convinced that appellant’s position was correct, but affirmed both murder convictions because it was bound by precedent to do so. Byrd v. United States, 500 A.2d 1376 (D.C.1985), vacated, 505 A.2d 51 (D.C.1986). See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Towles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Busey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API