Baker v. Lilienthal
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. A contract for sale of real estate is valid and binding where it is in writing and contains the following essentials: (1) it must specify the parties, that is, the seller and the buyer; (2) it must sufficiently describe the subject-matter of the contract; and (3) it must name the consideration. The consideration need not be expressly stated, if the contract furnishes the key by which the amount of the purchase-price can be ascertained. “If the consideration is not all to be paid in cash, then the°times and amounts of deferred payments must be specified. When the contract expressly states…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trust Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Muller v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Jennings v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by16 opinions
- Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Barto v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Blanton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Whitfield v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Carmichael v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.