Legal Opinion

Baker v. Lilienthal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1933No. 9384PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. A contract for sale of real estate is valid and binding where it is in writing and contains the following essentials: (1) it must specify the parties, that is, the seller and the buyer; (2) it must sufficiently describe the subject-matter of the contract; and (3) it must name the consideration. The consideration need not be expressly stated, if the contract furnishes the key by which the amount of the purchase-price can be ascertained. “If the consideration is not all to be paid in cash, then the°times and amounts of deferred payments must be specified. When the contract expressly states…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Muller v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Jennings v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Barto v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Blanton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Whitfield v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Carmichael v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API