Legal Opinion

Brown's Limousine Service, Inc. v. Irizzarry

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham J. Gellinoff, J.

In this action brought by plaintiff, a limousine service, for a judgment declaring that it is not subject to the New York City utility tax (Administrative Code of City of New York, ch 46), plaintiff moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff claims that, during the tax years in question, it was not a utility as defined by law, that the utility tax, if imposed, would constitute impermissible double taxation, and that the tax, if imposed, would constitute an unconstitutional taxation upon interstate commerce.

Only the last assertion merits extended discussion. As to the other claims, suffice to say…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. New York Ex Rel. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houston Contracting Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Brown's Limousine Service, Inc. v. IrizarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API