Legal Opinion

J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 6, 2009No. 5D08-2963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

J.C. appeals the trial court’s restitution order. She contends that the trial court erred by conducting the restitution hearing in her absence. We agree and reverse.

A defendant has the constitutional right to be present at all stages of a criminal proceeding, including a restitution hearing. Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009, 1013 (Fla.1995). “[U]nless the State can show that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to be present at his restitution hearing, it is error to proceed in his absence.” Baker v. State, 979 So.2d 453, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). A defendant’s waiver of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Capuzzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. C.A.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. CAM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. JC v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API