Starry v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
Presented in the guise of a simple problem of insurance coverage, this peculiarly “Alaskan” controversy raises a profound, albeit hairy question: is a “bear hide wall mount” a “fur” within the scope of an insurance exclusionary clause? Differently stated, “When is a fur not a Fur?” 1 .
I. BEAR FACTS
The bear hide wall mount in dispute was displayed on the living room wall in James F. Starry’s home. The hide was prepared as a rug, in a stretched-out fashion with the head and claws attached. 2 A burglar, as it were, left the wall bare, as it wasn’t. Starry filed a claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- U. S. Fire Insurance Co. v. ColverAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hahn v. Alaska Title Guaranty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Puritan Life Insurance Co. v. GuessAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. John Ellison, Sr., John Ellison, Jr., and Vince J. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
- Nile T. Deland v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.