Legal Opinion

Starry v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 6472PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Presented in the guise of a simple problem of insurance coverage, this peculiarly “Alaskan” controversy raises a profound, albeit hairy question: is a “bear hide wall mount” a “fur” within the scope of an insurance exclusionary clause? Differently stated, “When is a fur not a Fur?” 1 .

I. BEAR FACTS

The bear hide wall mount in dispute was displayed on the living room wall in James F. Starry’s home. The hide was prepared as a rug, in a stretched-out fashion with the head and claws attached. 2 A burglar, as it were, left the wall bare, as it wasn’t. Starry filed a claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. U. S. Fire Insurance Co. v. ColverAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Hahn v. Alaska Title Guaranty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Puritan Life Insurance Co. v. GuessAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. John Ellison, Sr., John Ellison, Jr., and Vince J. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
  5. Nile T. Deland v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API