Legal Opinion · Dissent

JS Ex Rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 13, 2011No. 08-4138Published

1Dissent

FISHER, Circuit Judge,

dissenting, with whom SCIRICA, RENDELL, BARRY, JORDAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges, join.

Today’s holding severely undermines schools’ authority to regulate students who “materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.” Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969). While I agree with the majority’s apparent adoption of the rule that off-campus student speech can rise to the level of a substantial disruption, I disagree with the Court’s application of that rule to the facts of this case.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bethel School District No. 403 v. FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API