Legal Opinion

Lambeck v. Stiefel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 9, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On. contract. On appeal from the First District Court of the city of Newark.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Fort, J.

This was a suit for breach of contract for services. The principles of law applicable to the case were correctly stated by the trial judge. It was a jury question 'and the jury has found for the plaintiff.

As the suit was originally instituted, the Anheuser-Busch Brewing Company was also a defendant. When the plaintiff rested, he asked leave to amend his pleadings by striking out this defendant. This the court granted. It is claimed that this was error. It was clearly within the power of the court, under the District Court act. Pamph. L. 1898,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cosgrove v. Metropolitan Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API