Legal Opinion

Smith v. Christian

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1909No. 1346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari, from Habersham superior court — Judge Kimsey. May 30, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Under the consent of counsel appearing in the record, in regard to the exceptions filed to the justice’s answer, it appears, that there was evidence before the jury that the note sued upon was executed upon the Sabbath day; that, although the note was dated on the following day, it was in fact signed and delivered to the plaintiff on Sunday; that the note was given for the purchase-price of a mule and buggy which the plaintiff carried to the house of the maker of the note on the same Sunday; that the maker of the note took possession of the mule and buggy that night, and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayden v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Morgan v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Calhoun v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Belle IsleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API