Legal Opinion

Commercial Standard Insurance v. Potete

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1981No. Civ. 2488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This case involves our statutory requirement of uninsured motorist coverage under § 32-7-23, Code of Alabama (1975). The defendant, Commercial Standard Insurance Company (CSI), appeals from a judgment awarding $10,000 to plaintiffs James E. and Bessie M. Potete.

The record reveals the following facts:

Plaintiff, James E. Potete, owner/operator of a truck, entered into a lease agreement to haul freight for Eagle Motor Lines (Eagle). The contract stated that Eagle would provide liability insurance for Potete while hauling for Eagle. Eagle provided such insurance through a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deal v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Taylor v. GodseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Cline v. Aetna Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1970
  5. Guardado v. Greyhound Rent-A-CarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Insurance v. PoteteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Commercial Standard Insurance v. PoteteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API