Legal Opinion
Perkey v. Cardwell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 9, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-463PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action for a writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241(c) (3).
This matter is before the Court on respondent’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the petition fails to state a claim for relief in federal habeas corpus.
On November 15, 1963, petitioner was indicted by the Knox County Grand Jury for one count of first degree murder in violation of § 2901.01, Ohio Revised Code, and two counts of shooting with intent to wound in violation of § 2901.-23, Ohio Revised…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Garner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gregory v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Massey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donald Brooks v. James H. Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Donald Brooks v. James H. Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Lundgren v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.