Legal Opinion

Turner v. Englewood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 2010No. 23909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} After deeming Stella Turner’s building a nuisance that needed to be abated, the city of Englewood demolished it. Before doing so, however, Englewood failed to afford Turner any administrative remedies concerning either its nuisance or demolition determination. Turner brought a “takings” claim against Englewood, seeking to recover damages for the city’s violation of her right to procedural due process of law. But a jury concluded that Englewood’s demolition was justified, finding that the building was a nuisance and that abatement by demolition was reasonably necessary.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McArthur v. DeSouzaOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Englewood v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. MarysvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Harson Investments, Ltd. v. TroyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API