Legal Opinion

Clarence C. Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 15, 1962No. 16591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

When this case was here before 1 *we affirmed the convictions of housebreaking and larceny without prejudice to the right of appellant to file a motion for a new trial in the District Court on the ground of newly discovered evidence. 2 The newly discovered evidence allegedly consisted of the testimony of the complaining witness, which he gave at another and later trial, to the effect that he had not made the complaint against appellant which resulted in his arrest in this case. This evidence might have been important because the warrant of arrest for the offenses had been issued on the basis…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clarence C. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monroe v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API