Legal Opinion

Davis v. McGuigan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 8, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Millar, J.,

Plaintiff in his bill alleges that he is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling candies at 922 Master Street, Philadelphia, Pa.; that he employes approximately 62 employes; that there is no strike or labor dispute at his factory and that all his employes are working. The bill then proceeds to allege that notwithstanding these facts defendant Candy Workers Union Local no. 350, and the individual defendants, who are officers or agents of the union, for the purpose of coercing plaintiff’s employes into joining defendant union, did conspire and combine to unlawfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kirmse v. AdlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Steffes v. Motion Picture Machine Operators UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Commonwealth v. MiddletonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. HansenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API