Anthony Marano Co. v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
A January 14, 2013, order states: Defendant Geoff Sherman removed this action from state court. A month later, this court issued an order directing Sherman to show cause why the action should not be remanded for Sherman’s failure to allege, in the notice of removal, *865facts establishing diversity of citizenship. The order set an October 29, 2009, deadline for Sherman’s response. Sherman missed the deadline; the court, stating that it “laek[ed] subject matter jurisdiction,” remanded the action (Dkt. # 6); and, on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- LVNV Funding LLC v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Pope v. QCHC of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020