Gershon v. Goldberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, *373abuse of process, defamation, and prima facie tort, (1) the defendants Judith Goldberg and Frederick Goldberg appeal, and the defendants George E Frooks, individually and doing business as Frooks & Frooks, and Frooks & Frooks separately appeal, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered March 14, 2005, as denied those branches of their respective motions which were to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gertler v. GoodgoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Gertler v. GoodgoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Engel v. CBS, INC.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sitar v. SitarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Riback v. MargulisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Pacific Carlton Development Corp. v. 752 Pacific, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Selechnik v. Law Office of BirnbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lafferty v. Eklecco, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.