Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 1994No. 92D-100898; CA A75169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*510De MUNIZ, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of contempt and the imposition of a punitive sanction pursuant to ORS 33.096. We are asked to consider for the first time the parameters of a trial court’s authority under that statute.

The trial court made these findings:

“Defendant, following his appearance on a traffic case [before the judge], returned to court and began berating the office staff in the trial court judge’s office and while in the judge’s presence. The judge was signing a stack of papers related to other cases. Defendant also made a disparaging remark about the judge to staff!;]…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rust v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Lindsey v. MerzenichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API