Legal Opinion
State v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 23, 1994No. 92D-100898; CA A75169PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*510De MUNIZ, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of contempt and the imposition of a punitive sanction pursuant to ORS 33.096. We are asked to consider for the first time the parameters of a trial court’s authority under that statute.
The trial court made these findings:
“Defendant, following his appearance on a traffic case [before the judge], returned to court and began berating the office staff in the trial court judge’s office and while in the judge’s presence. The judge was signing a stack of papers related to other cases. Defendant also made a disparaging remark about the judge to staff!;]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rust v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Lindsey v. MerzenichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.