Legal Opinion

Chenault v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 17, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 25 — INDICTMENT APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. No brief in record.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIEE JUSTICE LEWIS

delivered the opinion op the court.

The offense of grand larceny, as charged in the in dictment, and of which appellants were convicted, consisted of stealing and carrying from a railroad depot ginseng of the value exceeding ten dollars, which the evidence shows was in two sacks'. One of the sacks was found empty, and identified by a witness; but there was no direct evidence connecting either defendant with stealing the sacks from the depot, nor was there any circumstance from which it can be fairly inferred they either stole or received from another the identical ginseng,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clatos v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Dawes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  3. Coomer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API