Jackson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. State v. Rouse, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 79; Blackshear v. State, Fla.App.1971, 246 So.2d 173; Lashley v. State, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 648; and Koptyra v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 628. The judgment of conviction for possession and sale of narcotics is affirmed; however, since the sale and possession were aspects of a single transaction, based upon the reasoning in Yost v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 469, only one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Koptyra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Lashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- State v. RouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Blackshear v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977