State v. Hartman, 91040 (3-12-2009)

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Michael Hartman appeals his convictions and his adjudication as a Tier II offender under the Ohio Adam Walsh Act. Hartman assigns the following errors for our review:

"I. Appellant's conviction is legally insufficient to sustain verdicts of guilty of the offenses of importuning and compelling prostitution."

"II. Appellant's conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence."

"III. Appellant's classification under the Adam Walsh Act must be reversed as said act is unconstitutional and specifically violates the Retroactivity Clause of the Ohio…