Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1944No. 14654PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

This is an action in equity, presented in form of a bill of review. Kork Kelley and wife Alliene Kelley filed the action naming as defendants Ruth E. Wright, a feme sole, and H. F. Hawkins, Sheriff of Wichita County, Texas. Sheriff Hawkins was named a defendant for the purpose of securing an injunction against him selling the property in controversy under an order of sale previously issued.

The petition seeks a review of the judgment theretofore entered by the same court in cause No. 36927-B, styled Ruth E. Wright v. Kork Kelley and Alliene Kelley, in which the plaintiff in that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harding v. PearsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Crouch v. Panama Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Smith v. FerrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kelly v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Paul v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Garlington v. WassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Ziebarth v. Lee and Beulah Moor Children's HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API