Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Insurance v. Heldstab

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1937No. 33,185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The appeal in this foreclosure action was taken by a defendant from the order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to. his answer and cross petition filed in connection with his affidavit showing that a judgment had been rendered against him without other service than publication in a newspaper, the contention of the plaintiff being that the answer and cross petition was not a full answer to the petition as required by R. S. 60-2530 and did not constitute a defense to the petition of the plaintiff.

The affidavit seems to meet the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martens v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Frizell v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Cox v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rushford v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bemis v. BemisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. HeldstabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API