Legal Opinion

Gillingham v. Goldstone

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 14, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.

Plaintiffs sue the defendants for return of security in the amount of $200 which had been given to the defendants at the time the parties entered into a lease on December 5, 1958. The lease provided that the security would be forfeited if the tenant vacated “ before one year ”. The tenants vacated on or about June 28,1959.

The tenants contended that there was an actual eviction on June 28, 1959, and that the defendants breached the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment. The contention of actual eviction was not sustained. However, in the court’s opinion, the preponderance of all the credible…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. One Hundred & Forty-two West Fifty-seventh Street Co. v. TrowbridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saewitz v. EpsteinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  2. Gray v. Oxford Worldwide Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API