Legal Opinion

Stowell v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2011No. 10-2734PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

After Dr. Paul Huddleston, an orthopedic surgeon, performed spine surgery on Manley Stowell for his back pain, Mr. Stowell awoke completely blind in both eyes; the apparent cause of this loss of vision was posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION), a rare medical condition that results from a stroke to the optic nerves. Mr. Stowell and his wife, Enid Stowell, then brought an action under Minnesota law against Dr. Huddleston and Mayo Clinic, claiming that Dr. Huddleston, though not negligent in performing the surgery itself, had negligently failed to inform Mr. Stowell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Bellecourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Craig Shipp v. Kevin MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Patricio Flores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Mario Mancini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. Cannon v. Dehner -- See Order at [59] Upon Entering Final Judgment as to Karberg, Potter, Neuhaus, and BarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
  5. Fiorito v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API