Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Page

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 12, 1997No. 95-P-1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The motion to suppress. We accept the motion judge’s findings of fact as binding unless they are clearly erroneous, Commonwealth v. Berment, 39 Mass. App. Ct. 522, 523 (1995). After the hearing on the motion to suppress, the judge found the following facts. The defendant appeared in a hospital emergency room in the early morning hours of February 18, 1994. Judith Glenn, an off-duty police officer, was on uniformed private detail. After the defendant asked for assistance at the reception desk, he went outside with Glenn. A female (victim) was seated in the passenger seat of an automobile…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. MandileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. SanchezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MubdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. BachirMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API