Legal Opinion

Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 2006No. 04-1244PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

A section of Title 18 of the United States Code (called the Hobbs Act) says that an individual commits a federal crime if he or she “obstructs, delays, or affects commerce” by (1) “robbery,” (2) “extortion,” or (3) “committing] or threatening] physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan.or purpose to do anything in violation of this section§ 1951(a) (emphasis added). The dispute in these cases concerns the meaning of the underscored words, in particular the words, “in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section.” Does this phrase refer…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Luna Torres v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. LinvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. United States v. GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API