Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lockridge v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1969No. 9959Published

1DissentMcQUADE, Justice

The majority today reaches a position which is, perhaps, tenable as a matter of pure logic.1 I can not, however, agree with them that it is the law. They attempt to fit this case within the too-narrow “internal union matter” exception to the doctrine of federal pre-emption in labor law. That niche is entirely too small to accommodate this particular action. Although this ground has been plowed here before,2 a recapitulation of the United States Supreme Court cases, and the principles which may be derived therefrom, may serve to indicate more precisely the errors upon which the majority…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API