Legal Opinion

Hylsky v. Globe Democrat Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages for publishing alleged libelous article. Plaintiff asked $50,000 actual and $50,000 punitive damages. Defendant demurred to the petition [120] on the ground that it failed to state "facts sufficient in law to constitute a cause of action against defendant." The trial court sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff elected to stand upon his petition, refused to plead further and judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The petition alleged that on February 20, 1937, defendant maliciously published in its newspaper of and concerning plaintiff a false,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diener v. Star-Chronicle Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Warren v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Diener v. Star-Chronicle Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Clark v. McBaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Grossman v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Langworthy v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Jacobs v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Morningstar, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Coots v. PaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Anton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API