Legal Opinion

Nike, Inc. v. Enter Play Sports, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 24, 2015No. Case No. 3:14-cv-01104-SIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.

In the pending discovery dispute in this action for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, Plaintiff moves for entry of a protective order (Dkt. 29) to main*643tain the confidentiality of the parties’ respective trade secrets and other confidential information. Defendant does not oppose the need for a protective order, but seeks several additional provisions that Plaintiff opposes. Defendant also cross-moves for “discovery protections” (Dkt. 33), seeking an Order that Plaintiff must first provide a more specific list describing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DeRubeis v. Witten Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. Bio-Kinetics Corporation And Dana SummersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Intellicad Technology Consortium v. Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  4. Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. Bio-Kinetics Corporation And Dana SummersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API