Legal Opinion

King v. Bushnell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1887PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Wbit of Bbboe to the Circuit Court of Greene county; the Hon. Cybus Eplee, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

This was á bill filed by the plaintiff in error, Nathan A. King, to recover dower in certain lands of which Ms wife died seized in fee, as he alleges.

The facts disclosed by the record are, that Curtis Bushnell died intestate April 24; 1859, leaving Zerilda J. Bushnell, Ms widow, and four minor children, Ms only heirs-at-law, surviving. Mm. At the time of Ms death Curtis Bushnell was seized in fee simple of four hundred and sixteen acres of land, which included the premises in controversy. Zerilda J. Bushnell was appointed guardian of the minor children during the year 1859, and remained their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. WestIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vaught v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Johnston v. JicklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Straw v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Birchard v. SimonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Camp v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API