Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Baker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

July 9, 1903. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This appeal is from an order of his Honor, Judge Dantzler, dismissing the foregoing action because of the laches of the plaintiff. To understand this matter it will be necessary to refer to this action so as to learn its history and its scope. This may be done by referring to this same action as found in 44 S.C. at page 46. In the lower Court in that case the Circuit Judge had held that this was a case on the equity side of the Court, and had ordered the action transferred from calendar 1 for jury trials to calendar 2 for trial by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buist v. MelchersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. McAuley v. Orr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Stribling v. FretwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. White v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API