Legal Opinion

Smith v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 16, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

149 N.J. Super. 229 (1977)

373 A.2d 685

WALTER H. SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

CONSOLIDATED POLICE & FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND COMMISSION (DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS), RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 14, 1977.

Decided March 16, 1977.

Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and PRESSLER.

Mr. Harry Kay argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. Halpern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a final decision…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kochen v. CONSOLIDATED POL., & FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND COMM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. In Re VaccaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. In Re VaccaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Uricoli v. Police & Fire. Retirem. Sys.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Masse v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUB. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Steinmann v. State, Dept. of TreasurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Fiola v. NJ Treas. Dept.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Outland v. Board of TrusteesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API