Legal Opinion

In re Detmer/Beaudry

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2017No. 336348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwartzle, J.

*52We consider here whether the special protections provided to Native American parents and children under state law apply when a child is taken from her mother's care and residence and placed in her father's care and residence. Concluding that one of respondent-mother's children (AB) was "removed," we hold that the special protections set forth in the Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act do apply to AB's removal. Because the trial court failed to comply with those protections, we vacate and remand for further proceedings. With respect to the other child at issue in this appeal (KD), we hold…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Turner v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. In re SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Gleason v. William Scott KincaidMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. In re BeersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Debra Batton-Jajuga v. Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of MiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. John Gleason v. William Scott KincaidMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Terry a Killing v. Department of Labor and Economic OpportunityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API