Legal Opinion
National Surety Co. v. United Brick & Tile Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 9, 1934No. 4203PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HADD, Chief Justice.
Defendant in error, United Brick & Tile Company, alleged to be a corporation, filed this suit against James Stanton Construction Company, alleged to be a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas, with its principal office and place of business in the city of Leavenworth, Leavenworth county, Kan. The National Surety Company, also alleged to be a corporation, is made a party defendant.
As a basis for recovery, the brick and tile company alleged that on the 23d day of January, 1931, the James Stanton Construction Company…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
- Orthwein v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Fowler Commission Co. v. Charles Land & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Mitchell v. Banking Corp. of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Pool v. Wedemeyer & SchulteTexas Supreme Court · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Laurito v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. WoitaskeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Bowles & Edens Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Graham Construction Co. v. Walker Process Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.