Legal Opinion

Baden Baden Gold Mining Co. v. Jose

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1904No. 2474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Gilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtGuNtee, J.

Money judgment for appellees — plaintiffs. Therefrom this appeal.

1. Appellant — defendant—demurred to the complaint; this was overruled, and it answered. The *261grounds of demurrer were: (1) That the complaint was ambiguous and uncertain. (2) That it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The ruling was correct as to the first ground of demurrer, because the demurrer failed to point out wherein the complaint was ambiguous or uncertain.— Canfield v. Jeannotte, 31 Colo. 292, 293.

error was committed in overruling the demurrer it was waived by appellant answering over. —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Canfield v. JeannotteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. Fisher v. Kansas City Humboldt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. FrenchColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Berry v. FrenchColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API