State ex rel. Gibson v. St. Louis Circuit Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Application for mandamus. cited: Bryan v. Smith, 16 Mo. 322; Leeches & Neenan v. Dugdale, 41 Mo. 318; Franz v. Dietrich, 49 Mo. 95 ; Hurck v. Erskine, 50 Mo. 119 ; Young v. Frost, 1 Md. 397; Biscoe v. Tucker, 14 Ark. 522; Minor v. Medbury, 7 Wis. 100,
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
We are asked in this case to award against the judge of the ‘St. Louis Circuit Court, presiding in room No. 1, an alternative writ, ordering him to show cause why be should not be «directed to enter final judgment in favor of the relator, in a 'cause pending before him on exceptions to the final settlement of Charles Gibson, executor of Hamilton R. Gamble.
The record of the cause is not brought before us, but we ;are told in the petition for the writ that, after a trial in the Probate Court, judgment against the relator, and appeal to (the Circuit Court, the cause was tried at great cost of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hurck v. ErskineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Hurck v. ErskineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tate v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Gamble v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- State ex rel. Sweaney v. GentryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- State ex rel. Boeckler v. ThayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881