Legal Opinion

Meese v. De Arman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1923No. 13193Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

This action was brought by T. S. DeArman, defendant in error, hereafter called plaintiff against S. B. Meese, plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant, in the county court of Greer county, Okla., on a note secured by a chattel mortgage. The defendant files his answer unverified, and the only relief asked was that the mortgage be not foreclosed unta a certain suit of S. B. Meese against T. S. DeArman, being the same parties as in this case, be not heard until the final trial of a cause in the district court of Greer county, Ojkla. It appears that prior to the beginning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Killough v. Ft. Supply Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Thomason, Co. Treas. v. Board of Com'rs of DelawareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Delaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API