Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hollinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1951No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Defendant was found guilty of a violation of General Order No. A-191 effective May 1, 1946, of the Pennsylvania Milk Control Commission by a justice of the peace, and a fine of $25 was imposed for delivery of milk to his customers, on each, of three successive days in July, 1949. The order prohibits any milk dealer within the Harrisburg Milk Marketing Area, Area No. 8, from making a delivery of milk to a retail customer more often than once in a 48:hour period, and is known as the “every other day delivery order.” On appeal allowed, the case was submitted to the Court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Com. of Penna. v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. ObenrederSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth of Penna. v. AhlgrimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. Lodge No. 148 Loyal Order of MooseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. ClydeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API