Legal Opinion
Wogisch v. Tiger
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 30, 1966No. 435PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 So.2d 187 (1966)
Charles WOGISCH and Kathryn Wogisch, Appellants,
v.
Howard TIGER and Winifred Tiger et al., Appellees.
No. 435.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
December 30, 1966.
Sherman A. Katz, of Koenig & Katz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Thomas A. Thomas and Harvey Ford, Hollywood, for appellee City of Hollywood.
WALDEN, Judge.
This interlocutory appeal is addressed to a chancery order which granted the City of Hollywood leave to intervene in a pending cause. The cause pending was a suit for injunction. It sought to eliminate a hog farm operation being carried on by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morgareidge v. HoweySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Switow v. SherSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Bancroft v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Nelson v. Tropical Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Carr v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maryland Cas. Co. v. Hanson Dredging, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- CITIBANK, NA v. Blackhawk HeatingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- In Interest of JSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Wong v. Von WersebeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Boca Development Assoc., Ltd. v. Holiday City Civic Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.