Miller v. Lullman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. The deed from Mrs. Miller and Mead was duly executed, and conveyed the title, both legal and equitable, to the premises in controversy. Lincoln v. Rowe, 51 Mo. 574; Siemers v. Kleeburg, 56 Mo. 197. The deed from Mrs. Miller and Mead to Kerr was duly acknowledged. The certificate of acknowledgment is not affected by the “ relinquishment of dower ” contained in it.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. The deed from Mrs. Miller and Mead was duly executed, and conveyed the title, both legal and equitable, to the premises in controversy. Lincoln v. Rowe, 51 Mo. 574; Siemers v. Kleeburg, 56 Mo. 197. The deed from Mrs. Miller and Mead to Kerr was duly acknowledged. The certificate of acknowledgment is not affected by the “ relinquishment of dower ” contained in it. Chauvin v. Wagner, 18 Mo. 531; DeLassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425. The deed from Mrs. Miller and Mead was delivered to Kerr. Gould v. Day, 94 U. S. 112; Jackson v. Cleaveland, 15 Mich. 101; Somers…
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
Plaintiffs filed their petition in the circuit court of St. Louis, praying that the title to certain real estate therein described, be adjudged to have been vestedin Geo. 0. Miller by certain conveyances therein mentioned, and now in plaintiffs, as his heirs at law, subject to administration and the widow’s right of dower. The facts alleged upon which that decree is asked are, that on the 26th of February, 1879, Goo. O. Miller and his wife, the defendant, Kate C. Miller, by deed duly executed, acknowledged and delivered, conveyed said real estate to A. W. Mead, in trust, for the sole and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Devorse v. SniderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875