Legal Opinion

Tamas v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 22, 2014No. 11 C 1024PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Mary M. Rowland, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order [230] is GRANTED.

STATEMENT

On April 15, 2014, Defendant propounded 460 requests for admissions, along with related interrogatories, to each of 64 discovery opt-in Plaintiffs. The requests seek information on the discovery opt-in Plaintiffs job duties, responsibilities, and authority. Plaintiffs object to the requests, arguing that “Defendant’s staggering 29,440 requests for *347admission (460 requests * 64 discovery plaintiffs) ... seek admissions regarding matters that cannot be readily admitted or are otherwise clearly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. KasuboskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Misco, Inc., Mid-South Aluminum Company, and Everett W. Fielder, Jr. v. United States Steel Corporation and Alside, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Joseph L. v. Connecticut Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  5. Ocean Atlantic Woodland Corp. v. DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Belgrove v. BronnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Braun v. Village of PalatineDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Breuder v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 502, DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Cain v. PatelDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Cooper v. RezutkoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API