Tamas v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mary M. Rowland, Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order [230] is GRANTED.
STATEMENT
On April 15, 2014, Defendant propounded 460 requests for admissions, along with related interrogatories, to each of 64 discovery opt-in Plaintiffs. The requests seek information on the discovery opt-in Plaintiffs job duties, responsibilities, and authority. Plaintiffs object to the requests, arguing that “Defendant’s staggering 29,440 requests for *347admission (460 requests * 64 discovery plaintiffs) ... seek admissions regarding matters that cannot be readily admitted or are otherwise clearly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. KasuboskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Misco, Inc., Mid-South Aluminum Company, and Everett W. Fielder, Jr. v. United States Steel Corporation and Alside, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph L. v. Connecticut Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Ocean Atlantic Woodland Corp. v. DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
3Cited by14 opinions
- Belgrove v. BronnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Braun v. Village of PalatineDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Breuder v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 502, DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Cain v. PatelDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
- Cooper v. RezutkoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.