Rooks v. Tindall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Habeas corpus. Before Judge Bell. Fulton, superior court. February 21, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. Section 891 of the Penal Code, which merely defines the terms “delinquent child” and “wayward child,” as employed in the act approved September 4th, 1908 (Acts 1908, p. 1107), is not violative of art. 1, sec. 1, par. 3, of the constitution of this State, relative to due process of law, “in that it seeks to prohibit social intercourse of all persons in this State with other persons of vicious or immoral character.”
2. A criticism that “sections 885 to 900 inclusive of the Criminal Code” of this State are violative of art. 6, sec. 4, par. 7, of the constitution of Georgia, “in that it confers…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Stegall v. Southwest Georgia Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Tillman v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Hazleton v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Childress v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.