Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lilly v. Polsinelli, PC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2018No. WD 80698Published

1DissentAlok Ahuja, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Appellants Eugene Brooks Lilly and Shannon Lilly filed two lawsuits in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, making identical claims against Respondents Daniel D. Owen and Polsinelli PC. The Lillys filed the second action because they believed it would not be subject to a limitations defense which Owen and Polsinelli have asserted against the Lillys' first-filed Missouri action. The circuit court dismissed the second-filed suit under the abatement doctrine, based on the pendency of the prior case. I believe we have appellate jurisdiction to review the dismissal ruling,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Naylor Senior Citizens Housing, LP, and John Dilks v. Sides Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Fannie Mae v. My Quang TruongSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Craig v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. STATE EX REL. WYETH v. GradySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API