Legal Opinion

Marr v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMgALLISTER, C. J.

On March 27, 1964 an initiative petition for a constitutional amendment to be referred to the people of the state was filed with the Secretary of State, and on April 8, 1964, the Attorney General returned the following ballot title therefor:

BALLOT TITLE

“‘RIGHT-TO-WORK’ CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

PURPOSE: Prohibits requiring labor organization membership, payment of dues or approval to secure or hold a job. Provides for criminal penalties, damages, court injunctions for violations.”

The petitioners being dissatisfied with the ballot title provided by the Attorney General for the initiative…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kouns v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Whelan v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API