Legal Opinion

Gibson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 25, 1904No. 195PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. This is an appeal from the Court of Claims. The claimant is a retired rear admiral. This action was prosecuted to recover the difference between three-fourths the pay of a brigadier general and that of a major general of the Army, accorded by statute to retired rear admirals. The Court of Claims dismissed the petition, holding the claimant entitled to three-fourths the pay of a brigadier general.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. This is an appeal from the Court of Claims. The claimant is a retired rear admiral. This action was prosecuted to recover the difference between three-fourths the pay of a brigadier general and that of a major general of the Army, accorded by statute to retired rear admirals. The Court of Claims dismissed the petition, holding the claimant entitled to three-fourths the pay of a brigadier general. Upon the hearing in that court the following facts were found: “I. The claimant, William C. Gibson, was duly appointed a captain in the Navy, to rank from February'…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Day,

after making.the-foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the .court.

' The first question presented is whether a captain in. the Navy retired- as a rear admiral, under section 1444 of the Revised Statutes of the United States and section 11 of the Navy Personnel- Act, shall receive three-fourths of the pay of the rear admirals in the nine higher numbers in the list of rear admirals or the like proportion of the pay of; the nine lower numbers of the eighteen rear admirals. '

Section 1444 of the Revised Statutes provides: “When any officer below the rank of vice admiral is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. Vincent Pecelli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
  5. United States v. William Theodore LovelyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API