Legal Opinion

Brady v. Hanson

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for partition. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The plaintiffs, as heirs at law of Joseph G. Hanson, deceased, bring this action for the partition of the premises known by the number 346 Bleeeker street, in the borough of Manhattan, Hew York city, of which the said decedent died seized on or about August 1, 1903, in the city of Bayonne, county of Hudson, State of Hew Jersey, leaving him surviving no widow and the following heirs at law: Harriet A. Brady, one of the plaintiffs, a child; William G. Hanson, one of the plaintiffs, a grandchild, a son of James E. Hanson, a son who predeceased Joseph G. Hanson; Joseph H. Hanson, defendant, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greene v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Cuthbert v. . ChauvetNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Delafield v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Stewart v. WoolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Eisner v. CurielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Louis Union Trust Company v. ConantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API