Jordan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion
ON THE MERITS
I
It appears in the record that the appellant submitted to the trial court for its consideration a series of seventy or more questions to be asked the venire concerning their qualifications, interests, or bias in the trial of the defendant.
Defendant complains in her argument that the court erred in striking from the list questions 29 and 57, which appear in the defendant’s brief. We quote:
“29. Do you feel that you know too much about this case, from the pretrial publicity that has surrounded it, that you feel you should be disqualified from the case? 29. Do you think it might…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.